Monthly Archives: December 2013

US Scholars Support Boycott of Israel

 

Published on Monday, December 16, 2013 by Common Dreams

‘Historic’: US Scholars Stand with Palestinians in Boycott of Israel

‘This stance in solidarity with Palestinian freedom is historic and signals a new era of engagement with colonized populations’

– Sarah Lazare, staff writer

An association of 5,000 academics on Monday became the largest U.S. scholarly organization ever to join the boycott of Israeli academic institutions.

The American Studies Association, which calls itself “the nation’s oldest and largest association devoted to the interdisciplinary study of American culture and history,” announced Monday that its membership passed a resolution stipulating the organization “endorses and will honor the call of Palestinian civil society for a boycott of Israeli academic institutions.”

The resolution, which was introduced last year and unanimously endorsed by the ASA’s national council on November 4th, attracted an unprecedented number of voters, with 66.05% endorsing the resolution, 30.5% against, and 3.43% abstaining, according to the ASA statement.

“The overwhelming majority that voted in favor of the resolution illustrate that we refuse to lend complicity to Israel’s aggression,” Steven Salaita, associate professor of English at Virginia Tech and a member of the ASA Activism Caucus, told Common Dreams. “This stance in solidarity with Palestinian freedom is historic and signals a new era of engagement with colonized populations.”

The resolution passed with an outpouring of support from ASA members, including renowned activist, author, and scholar Angela Davis. “The similarities between historical Jim Crow practices and contemporary regimes of segregation in Occupied Palestine make this resolution an ethical imperative for the ASA,” she wrote. “If we have learned the most important lesson promulgated by Dr. Martin Luther King—that justice is always indivisible—it should be clear that a mass movement in solidarity with Palestinian freedom is long overdue.”

The ASA has faced an onslaught of criticisms and attacks from pro-Israel forces, including calls from former Harvard president and Obama administration official Larry Summers for a boycott of the ASA on grounds that the resolution violates academic freedom and perpetuates anti-Semitism.

Yet Alex Lubin, Director of the Center for American Studies and Research at the American University of Beirut, slammed such accusations writing last month in The Nation,

Academic freedom means very little when it takes place in a context of segregation and apartheid. Change came to the Jim Crow South not through academic dialogue, but through protest and, in some cases, through boycotts of the institutions that fostered segregation. Change came to South Africa’s apartheid system not through academic dialogue, but through protest, resistance, and an international boycott. Those of us who value academic freedom must always struggle to ensure that the world surrounding academia provides the basic human rights that enable academic life.

“The boycott resolution is intended to address a profound case of discrimination against Palestinians and is consistent with the ASA’s previous endorsement of anti-racist positions in other areas,” Lubin stated upon endorsing the resolution. “The resolution does not target Israelis, Jews, or any individuals; indeed, the ASA’s support for the boycott affirms its opposition to all forms of racial discrimination, including, but not limited to, anti-Semitism and Islamophobia.”

The call for boycott, divestment, and sanctions against Israel emerged from Palestinian civil socieity organizations in 2005 in a bid to win human rights, self-determination, and freedom from occupation for Palestinians, using tactics similar to those levied to transform apartheid South Africa.

Palestinian activist Omar Barghouti writes in The Nation that 2013 has seen great strides in the academic wing of this BDS movement:

Days ago, in a letter of support to the ASA, the University of Hawaii Ethnic Studies department became the first academic department in the west to support the academic boycott of Israel. In April, the Association for Asian-American Studies endorsed the academic boycott—the first professional academic association in the United States to do so. Around the same time, the Teachers’ Union of Ireland unanimously called on its members to “cease all cultural and academic collaboration” with the “apartheid state of Israel,” and the Federation of French-Speaking Belgian Students (FEF), representing 100,000 members, adopted “a freeze of all academic partnerships with Israeli academic institutions.” Also this year, student councils at several North American universities, including at the University of California Berkeley, called for divestment from companies profiting from Israel’s occupation.

The full text of the ASA’s resolution follows:

Whereas the American Studies Association is committed to the pursuit of social justice, to the struggle against all forms of racism, including anti-semitism, discrimination, and xenophobia, and to solidarity with aggrieved peoples in the United States and in the world;

Whereas the United States plays a significant role in enabling the Israeli occupation of Palestine and the expansion of illegal settlements and the Wall in violation of international law, as well as in supporting the systematic discrimination against Palestinians, which has had documented devastating impact on the overall well-being, the exercise of political and human rights, the freedom of movement, and the educational opportunities of Palestinians;

Whereas there is no effective or substantive academic freedom for Palestinian students and scholars under conditions of Israeli occupation, and Israeli institutions of higher learning are a party to Israeli state policies that violate human rights and negatively impact the working conditions of Palestinian scholars and students;

Whereas the American Studies Association is cognizant of Israeli scholars and students who are critical of Israeli state policies and who support the international boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement under conditions of isolation and threat of sanction;

Whereas the American Studies Association is dedicated to the right of students and scholars to pursue education and research without undue state interference, repression, and military violence, and in keeping with the spirit of its previous statements supports the right of students and scholars to intellectual freedom and to political dissent as citizens and scholars;

It is resolved that the American Studies Association (ASA) endorses and will honor the call of Palestinian civil society for a boycott of Israeli academic institutions. It is also resolved that the ASA supports the protected rights of students and scholars everywhere to engage in research and public speaking about Israel-Palestine and in support of the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement.

_____________________

 

 

 

Challenging prejudice against LGBT in South Asian Diaspora

Thanks SANSAD for your news release of December 15. 2013.

I want to highlight that, in addition to what is going on in India, and elsewhere in South Asia, the local South Asian GLBT community also experiences prejudice, intolerance and ostracism from within (as well as without) the South Asian community in Greater Vancouver.

I hope that we too can reflect on our own levels of acceptance and whether we need to do further work in this regard toward local GLBT South Asians.

I propose that we use this forum to continue the discussion on challenging and overcoming our and South Asian diaspora’s prejudices toward LGBT South Asians as a step toward raising greater awareness of LGBT rights as essential human rights and freedoms.

Randeep Purewall

 

Delete Section 377 of Indian Penal Code

SANSAD News Release December 15, 2013

 

December 15, 2013 is being observed in cities across the world as a “Day Of Rage” against the regressive judgement of the Supreme Court of India on December 11 overturning the historic decision of the Delhi High Court in 2009 that Section 377 of IPC was in violation of Articles 21, 14 and 15 of the Indian Constitution. South Asian Network for Secularism and Democracy stands in solidarity with the LGBT community in India and the world on this day of condemnation for a judgment that sets the clock back in the struggle for justice and hunan rights for people who find their sexual identity outside the heterosexual norm,

The Division Bench of Delhi High Court had declared that Section 377 IPC, created in 1860 and based on Victorian morality with notions of carnally and sinfulness was unconstitutional in criminalizing sexual acts of consenting adults in private. The Court had affirmed that the clarification would hold till Parliament chose to amend the law. This decision had been widely hailed as a big step forward in the struggle for Human Rights and effected a huge difference in the lives of LGBT in India and in the culture of the country.

The judgement of the Supreme Court Bench, comprising S J Mukhopadhyaya and G Singhvi in Suresh Kumar Kaushal v Naz Foundation delivered on December 11, 2013 overturns this decision on the ground that as only “a miniscule fraction” of the country’s population was LGBT and less that two hundred people had been prosecuted under Section 377 in the last 150 years, there was no sound reason for considering the section ultra vires. The learned judges also find that the distinction between people who indulge in “carnal intercourse in the ordinary manner” and those who indulge in “carnal intercourse against the order of nature” is non-arbitrary, so that it is legitimate to declare the latter as an offense and prescribe punishment for it. That a provision is prone to abuse in practice and can be used to harass, intimidate, and drive people underground, is not, they rule, a valid argument against its constitutionality. They further rule that in finding Section 377 as violating a person’s right to privacy, autonomy and dignity, the Delhi High Court relied extensively on judgment of other jurisdictions which cannot be “applied blindfold” for deciding constitutionality. The constitutional provision of capital punishment in India establishes the difference of the Indian condition.

This judgement, which set back Human Rights in India the day after the International Human Rights Day, has provoked outrage from a broad section of Indian society, including mainstream media and major political parties. It has given an impetus to the ongoing struggle for Human Rights in India. We, members of the South Asian diaspora in British Columbia, Canada, are proud to join with the LGBT community, and all people dedicated to the realization of Human Rights in protesting this decision.

The learned judges of the Supreme Court have supported their conservatism by pointing out that the Indian Parliament has not bothered to deal with the pre-constitution Section 377 in the past 60 years. They have also noted that there has been no attempt by the Legislature to address the recommendation of the 172nd Law Commission Report (2000) that this section be deleted. They end their report with the statement that their decision is only on the issue of constitutionality and that the Legislature is free to consider the desirability of deleting the Section. The struggle for rights is political: the demand now should be for the implementation of the recommendation of the 172nd Law Commission: DELETE SECTION 377 IPC.

—Thirty—

 

South Asian Network for Secularism and Democracy (SANSAD): 2779 Commercial Drive, Vancouver, BC. www. sansad.org; sansad@sansad.org

 

 

On the SC judgement on Section 377: Statement from TISS teachers

From posting on Kafila.org/2013/12/13

By Nivedita Menon

DECEMBER 13, 2013

It is with deep shock and disappointment that we received the regressive judgment of the Supreme Court dated 11-12-13, on the reading down of Section 377 of the IPC related to the rights of queer (lesbian bisexual gay and transgender…) people in this country, which reverted the decriminalisation of non-normative sexualities following the Delhi High Court judgement in 2009.

The Delhi High Court had based its expansive judgement on the eloquent discussion of constitutional morality by the framers of our Constitution, especially Dr. Ambedkar. Constitutional morality, they argued is the basis for equality of citizens since public morality which is largely the morality of the dominant forces in society can never guarantee democracy, and perhaps even more importantly equality and dignity to its citizens, especially its most marginal citizens. Additionally, The Delhi High Court judgement evoked the spirit of dignity, inclusiveness and non-discrimination, thereby emphasizing equality of all citizens that Nehru spoke of during the Constituent Assembly debates, so necessary for the deeply hierarchical social fabric that our country represents.

We, the undersigned teachers at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences express solidarity with the struggle for the recognition of the basic human and democratic rights of LGBT citizens and for our right to self-determination in keeping with the foundational principles of the Indian Constitution.

In solidarity,

1)    Meena Gopal, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

2)    Wandana Sonalkar, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

3)    Asha Achutan, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

4)    Bindhulakshmi, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

5)    Sangita Tosar, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

6)    K.C. Bindu, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

7)    Ilina Sen, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

8)    Nishi Mitra, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

9)    Zeba Imam, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

10)Sujata Chavan, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

11)Anjali Monteiro, Centre for the Study of Contemporary Culture, School of Media and Cultural Studies.

12)K.P. Jayasankar, Centre for Critical Media Praxis, School of Media and Cultural Studies.

13)Shilpa Phadke, Centre for the Study of Contemporary Culture, School of Media and Cultural Studies.

14)Faiz Ullah, Centre for the Study of Contemporary Culture, School of Media and Cultural Studies.

15)Nikhil Titus, Centre for Critical Media Praxis, School of Media and Cultural Studies.

16)Ketaki Ranade, Centre for Health and Mental Health

17)Roopa Madhav, School of Habitat Studies

 

18)Trupti Jhaveri Panchal, Centre for Equity for Women, Children & Families, and Special Cell for Women & Children Maharashtra & Resource Centre for Interventions on Violence Against Women (RCI-VAW)

 

19)Taranga Sriraman, Vinita Ajgaonkar, Yashoda Pradhan, Manisha Kande (Resource Centre for Interventions on Violence Against Women)

20)Sivakami Muthusamy, Centre for Health and Social Sciences, School of Health Systems Studies.

21)Nilesh Gawde, School of Health System Studies

22)Vijayakumar, Centre for Social and Organisational Leadership

23)Lata Narayan, Centre for Lifelong Learning.

24)Tejaswini Niranjana, Centre for Indian Languages in Higher Education.

25)Monica Sakhrani, Centre for Social Justice and Governance

26)Bal Rakshase, Centre for Health Policy Planning and Management, School of Health Systems Studies.

27)Shalini Bharat, Centre for Health and Social Sciences, School of Health Systems Studies.

28)Sanjay (Xonzoi) Barbora, TISS, Guwahati

29)R. Ramakumar, School of Development Studies

30)Manish Jha, Centre for Community Organisation and Development Practice, School of Social Work

31)Mahuya Bandyopadhyay, School of Development Studies

32)Anjali Dave, Centre for Equity for Women Children and Families, School of Social Work.

33)Sabiha Vasi, Centre for Lifelong Learning.

34)Rekha Pappu, TISS Hyderabad

35)Padma Velaskar, Centre for Studies in Sociology of Education

36)A. Ramaiah, Centre for Study of Social Exclusion and Inclusive Policies.

37)Neela Dabir, Deputy Director, Admn

38)Shubhada Maitra, Centre for Health and Mental Health, School of Social Work.

39)Geeta Sethi, LSE-TISS Chair Professor, School of Health Systems Studies.

40)Vijayaraghavan, Centre for Criminology and Justice

41)Swati Banerjee, Centre for Livelihoods and Social Innovation, School of Social Work.

42)Anil S Sutar, Centre for Research Methodology.

43)Tanveer Hasan, Centre for Indian Languages in Higher Education.

44)Shalini Sharma, TISS Guwahati.

45)Sandhya Limaye, Centre for Disability Studies and Action, School of Social Work.

46)Subharati Ghosh, Center for Health and Mental Health

47)Asha Banu, Centre for Health and Mental Health, School of Social Work.

48)Katy Gandevia, School of Social Work

49)Anil Kumar, Centre for Health and Social Sciences, School of Health Systems Studies.

50)Suryakant Waghmore, Centre for Environment Equity and Justice

51)Leena Abraham, Centre for Studies in Sociology of Education

52)Shivani Chauhan Barooah, Labour Studies and Social Security, TISS Guwahati.

53)Sohini Banerjee, TISS Guwahati

54)Rekha Mammen, Centre for Community Organisation and Development Practice

55)U.Vindhya, TISS Hyderabad

56)Padmini Swaminathan, TISS Hyderabad

57)Priyanka Jawale, School of Law, Rights & Constitutional Governance

58)Surinder Jaswal, School of Social Work & Doctoral Students Office

59)Samhita Barooah, TISS Guwahati

60)Janki Andharia, Jamshedji Tata Centre for Disaster Management

61)Bela Bhatia, TISS

62)Hemal Shroff, School of Health System Studies

63)Nandini Manjrekar, School of Education

64)Sohini Sengupta, TISS

65)Mahima Nayar, Centre for Disability Studies and Action

66)Mouleshri Vyas, Centre for Community Organisation and Development Practice, School of Social Work

67)A. Rambabu, Centre for Studies in Social Exclusion and Inclusive Policies

68)Shankar Das, Centre for Health Policy Planning

69)Jyothi Krishnan, TISS

70)Shahaji Chavan, TISS

71)G G Wankhede, School of Education

72)P.K. Shajahan, School of Social Work

73)Lakshmi Lingam, Deputy Director, Hyderabad

74)T. Jayaraman, School of Habitat Studies

75)S. Parasuraman, Director, TISS

and many other TISS faculty.