All posts by SANSAD

Forum on South Asia Peace and Democracy

Peace Now: No Nukes Over South Asia

In the past twenty years since the nuclear weapons tests by India and Pakistan, both countries have sunk into deeper social crises and seen the rise of inequality, militarization, and religious nationalism, creating an urgent threat to peace in the subcontinent and security in the world. Four prominent public intellectuals from Pakistan and India will address a public forum on matters that have engaged them in their work on democracy, human rights, pluralism, freedom of expression, and peace.

Panel:
Zia Mian: The Nuclear Danger in South Asia
A. H. Nayyar: Building Peace Under the Nuclear Shadow
Rammanohar Reddy: Crisis of Democracy and the Assault on the Media
Achin Vanaik: Nationalism, Democracy, Internationalism

Moderator: Haider Nizamani

The panel will be followed by a film: Pakistan and India Under the Nuclear Shadow (33 minutes)

Speaker profiles:

Zia Mian is a physicist, activist and co-director of Princeton University’s Program on Science and Global Security, which is part of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. His research and teaching focuses on nuclear weapons and nuclear energy policy. He is co-chair of the International Panel on Fissile Materials (IPFM), a group of independent experts from eighteen countries working to reduce global stockpiles of nuclear weapon-useable material. He serves on the board of the Arms Control Association and previously served on the board of Peace Action, the largest US grassroots peace network. He received the 2014 Linus Pauling Legacy Award for “his accomplishments as a scientist and as a peace activist in contributing to the global effort for nuclear disarmament and for a more peaceful world. In 2018, he was selected as one of the “60 faces of CND” by the UK Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament to mark its 60th anniversary.

Dr. Abdul Hameed Nayyar is a physicist who retired from Quaid-e-Azam University Islamabad after serving it for over 30 years. He has a PhD in theoretical condensed matter physics from Imperil College London. He has worked extensively on the technical analysis of nuclear disarmament issues and associated with programs that provide education to children of disadvantaged sections of the society. Dr. Nayyar is a member of the International Panel on Fissile Materials and was awarded the 2010 Joseph A. Burton Award from the American Physical Society. He has participated in national, regional and international anti-nuclear peace movements and served as President of the Pakistan Peace Coalition, and was a founding member of the Asian Peace Alliance.

C. Rammanohar Reddy has a Ph.D. in Economics but has been in journalism since 1988. He is currently Readers’ Editor at Scroll.in. He was earlier Editor of ‘Economic and Political Weekly’ (2004-16). With MV Ramana he co-edited “Prisoners of the Nuclear Dream” (Orient Longman, 2003). He is the author of “Demonetisation and Black Money” (2017).

Achin Vanaik is a retired Professor of “International Relations and Global Politics” in the Political Science Department of Delhi University. He has authored or coauthored or edited or co-edited 10 books ranging from studies on contemporary India’s politics/economy/foreign policy to matters of religion, secularism, communalism and nationalism to issues of international politics and nuclear disarmament. He has been actively involved in various civil liberties and anti-communal activities and is a founder-member of the Coalition for Nuclear Disarmament and Peace (CNDP), India. He has been a Fellow of the Transnational Institute based in Amsterdam from 1988 onwards and has served twice on the Board of Executives of Greenpeace India. Along with Praful Bidwai, he was awarded the Sean MacBride International Peace Prize for the year 2000.

Organized by South Asian Network forSecularism and Democracy (SANSAD). Co-sponsored by the Institute for the Humanities, SFU, South Asian Film Education Society (SAFES), and Committee of Progressive Pakistani Canadians (CPPC). Speakers courtesy of the School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, UBC.

Date: May 26, 2018 (Saturday), 2 to 5 PM
Venue: Room 7000, Harbour Centre, Simon Fraser University, 515 W Hastings St, Vancouver, BC V6B 5K3

Video record of the event: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyG1s4Qwajo

South Asians in Labor and Liberation in East Africa

Talk by Sultan Somjee

May 12, 2.00 pm – 4.30 pm
Ambedkar Room (418)
Surrey City Centre Library
10350 University Drive, Surrey

The participation of South Asians in the struggles of labor and toward liberation in East Africa is little known yet significant. Sultan Somjee, who worked in the underground with the world-renowned Kenyan writer and radical activist, Ngugi Wa-Thiongo will retrieve the contribution of South Asians to these struggles. He will also read from his works of ethno-fiction.
Somjee is an ehnographer who got his PhD at McGill’s and lived with indigenous people in East Africa for more than 30 years. He was Head of Ethnography at the National Museum of Kenya and curated the “Asian African Heritage Exhibition.” He introduced Indigenous Arts Education in Kenyan schools and set up museums of peace at grassroots level in conflict zones. He has curated several exhibitions and written several books and articles.
There will be a discussion following the presentation.
Contact: Chin Banerjee, cbanerjee@telus.net
Organized by South Asian Network for Secularism and Democracy (SANSAD), www. Sansad.org; https://www.facebook.com/sansad.org/

Public forum on immigrant/refugee detention

 

Surrey: Sanctuary City, not Detention City

 

Public Forum
March 4, 2018, 1.00 pm -4.00 Pm
Surrey Centre Library, Room 120
10350 University Drive, Surrey

Panel:
Chelliah Premrajah, Harsha Walia, Mohammad Zaman
Moderator: Sejal Lal
Overture: hospitality in Vancouver: Patricia Gruben with Martin Gotfrit on mandolin
The Government of Canada has signed a contract with an engineering company to build a New Immigration Detention Centre in Surrey at 13130-76 Avenue as a part of its infrastructure development plan. It is expected to be completed by November 2018 to replace the current holding center at the Vancouver airport and minimize the practice of placing immigrants/refugees in prisons. The detention of refugees with common criminals, for which Canada is conspicuous in the world, has been condemned by the UNHRC.

While the government promises profits to businesses, jobs to workers and taxes to the city, we need to understand the significance of detaining “immigrants, “the word used to cover refugees, who generate public sympathy, in the context of the larger world. The issue of the treatment of refugees by national governments has become extremely urgent in a world that currently has 22 million refugees according to the UN. This number can only grow as wars and climate change—and climate change induced wars—drive more and more people desperately to seek safety and livelihood far from their burnt, bombed, and abandoned homes. We are all aware of the droughts, wars and genocides that have driven millions to flee from Africa, Syria, Myanmar, and Afghanistan
Governments across the world have responded to this by creating barriers and adopting coercive measures, often in response to anti-immigrant popular movements, as we see in the US, Europe, particularly Central and Eastern Europe, and India. However, against this right-wing populism there has been the resistance of people with generous hearts who have opened their homes and purses for the succor of fellow human beings and established cities of sanctuary. We have seen this Canada in response to the refugees from Syria.
We need to be a part of this ethical politics of hospitality and welcome rather than incarcerate refugees. We must resist the labelling of refugees as “immigrant” or “illegal immigrant” to rationalize repression and block the gates of compassion. Particularly in the city of Surrey which is proud of its diversity we should build a sanctuary city and not allow the construction of detention centers.

Presenters:
Premrajah Chelliah is a member of SANSAD and Amnesty International. He is a retired healthcare worker, a life-long activist in the labor movement and life-member and past president of Tamil Cultural Association of BC. He is Secretary of BC Seniors Shanti Nilayam and a member of the Outreach and Social Justice Committee of Gilmore Park United Church, which co-sponsored Guatemalan, Afghan, and Syrian refugees.
Martin Gotfrit is emeritus professor of music and former Dean of the School for Contemporary Arts at Simon Fraser University. He is activist in hospitality for refugees through Or Shalom Synagogue.
Patricia Gruben is professor in film studies at Simon Fraser University. She is a leader in hospitality for refugees in Vancouver.
Sejal Lal is a musician and activist in human rights, South Asian youth issues, and indigenous support. She is a member of SANSAD.
Harsha Walia is cofounder of migrant justice group, No One is Illegal. She is the author of award-winning book, Undoing Border imperialism and Project Coordinator at Downtown Eastside Women’s Center. For the pat two decades she has been involved in immigrant and refugee rights, including supporting migrant detainees and campaigning against immigrant detention, deaths in detention, children in detention, and arbitrary detention. She has co-authored numerous reports on migrant and refugee issues in Canada and presented at the United Nations on immigration detention in Canada.
Mohammad Zaman is an international development/resettlement specialist. He recently has written a number of articles on Rohingya refugees in papers in Bangladesh and Canada.

Organized by South Asian Network for Secularism and Democracy (SANSAD), www.sansad.org; https://www.facebook.com/events/2096748527239170/

Asma Jehangir passes away

current edition: International edition

‘An indomitable will’ – why Asma Jahangir was Pakistan’s social conscience

The formidable human rights lawyer and activist died on Sunday having spent her life fighting against religious extremism and for the rights of women and oppressed minorities

‘A legal watchdog and a political fighter’ ... Asma Jahangir.
‘A legal watchdog and a political fighter’ … Asma Jahangir. Photograph: Carlos Osorio/Toronto Star via Getty Images

She stood a smidgen over 5ft and had fine, delicate bones. But the bird-like frame contained a courageous heart, an indomitable will and an unflagging social conscience. The death of Asma Jahangir, the Pakistani activist, lawyer and human rights campaigner who passed away on Sunday after suffering a cardiac arrest at her home in Lahore, has left a nation reeling with a profound sense of loss.

Looking through social media I am not surprised by the number of tributes to her, but by the fact that they come from her detractors as well as her supporters. The conservatives who branded her a traitor until last week are now acknowledging her courage. Whether that is out of political expediency or genuine feeling I cannot say. But for the besieged liberal community and the religious minorities of Pakistan, she was indispensable. When plainclothes security men barrelled into my sister’s home one night in 1999, dragging away my journalist brother-in-law at gunpoint, the first person she called was Asma. That’s how it was. If you wanted someone in your corner, you called Asma. And she would respond at once.

When I heard the news of her death, my first thought, regrettably, was for myself: “Who will have our backs now?” I was not the only one. A legal watchdog and a political fighter, Jahangir patrolled the rights of secular liberals, religious minorities, the politically disenfranchised, wronged women, abused children; she even fought for the constitutional rights of the very same religious extremists and hard-right nationalists who would have had her silenced.

Jahangir was six years old when her politician father, Malik Ghulam Jilani, opposed Ayub Khan’s martial law in 1958. In 1971, when her father was arrested by another military dictator, Yahya Khan, the teenage girl filed a petition for his release in the Lahore high court: Asma Jilani v the government of the Punjab.

“Courts were not new to me,” she joked with her customary levity. “Even before his detention, my father was fighting many cases. He remained in jail in Multan. He remained in jail in Bannu. But we were not allowed to go see him there. We always saw him in courts. So for me, the courts were a place where you dressed up to see your father. It had a very nice feeling to it.”

The Lahore high court dismissed her petition. Undaunted, Jahangir appealed to the supreme court. In 1972, after Khan’s dictatorship had ended, the court decided it had been illegal and declared him a usurper. Jahangir had won her first case.

She began her legal career as a family lawyer. In 1980, along with her sister Hina Jilani and two friends, she set up a firm specialising in divorce, maintenance payments and custodial cases. It was her work with women that brought her to politics. She realised early on that while it was important to fight for oppressed individuals, what was needed was institutional reform and societal change. So when Zia ul-Haq, Pakistan’s third military dictator, amended the constitution to discriminate against women and religious minorities under the guise of an Islamising agenda, Jahangir publicly challenged his ordinance, questioning its moral underpinnings. He was a brutal dictator with a taste for public floggings who responded by slapping a blasphemy case against her, yet she did not shy away from the fight. Many years later, she wrote: “We may fight terrorism through brute force, but the terror that is unleashed in the name of religion can only be challenged through moral courage.”

Jahangir addresses a 2009 rally in Lahore, protesting against the public flogging of a veiled woman.
Pinterest
Jahangir addresses a 2009 rally in Lahore, protesting against the public flogging of a veiled woman. Photograph: Arif Ali/AFP/Getty Images

She was never lacking in that moral courage. Or in the energy required to pursue the goals she set herself. The list of her accomplishments goes on and on. A founder member of Women’s Action Forum and of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan; a long-serving UN special rapporteur on human rights; the first woman president of the Supreme Court Bar Association. She opened the first legal aid centre and refuge for battered women in Pakistan. She took on cases that nobody else would touch. She fought for poor Christians accused of blasphemy, a crime punishable by death, but which also put their defenders at risk of assassination at the hands of religious fanatics. In representing bonded labourers, she fought against institutionalised slavery, and in speaking for girls who wanted to marry of their own choice, took on centuries of misogynistic custom, earning the wrath of mullahs, urbane senators and tribal leaders alike.

What rattled her nationalist detractors the most was her consistent critique of human rights abuses in Pakistan. They labelled her a traitor and accused her of being an Indian spy or an American agent. Why couldn’t she highlight similar abuses in other countries? Why must she spread negative propaganda against Pakistan? The fact was that she did call out human rights abuses wherever she found them. She alerted the world to the plight of the Rohingyas, the Palestinians and the Kashmiris, but she was most exercised by atrocities at home. As she said in one interview: “I think it sounds very hollow if I keep talking about the rights of Kashmiris, but do not talk about the rights of a woman in Lahore who is battered to death.”

Jahangir fought on many fronts, but perhaps her greatest ire was reserved for religious extremists and military dictators. She lampooned mullahs mercilessly, mocking their frizzy beards and fuzzy thinking. When other activists called out the ISI, Pakistan’s feared intelligence service, they did so cautiously, referring to it as “the deep state”, “the establishment” or “the powers that be”, knowing what every schoolchild in Pakistan knows: forced disappearances are a fact of life. But Jahangir alone had the courage to go on live television and say: “These duffers, these duffer generals … need to return to their barracks and stay there.” Her commitment to democracy was unwavering. She knew that however corrupt, venal or inefficient civilian leaders might be, they were always preferable to military dictators. “However flawed democracy is,” she told the New Yorker, “it is still the only answer.”

But while others in her place might have lain low for a while or quietly left the country for a spot of “family time”, Jahangir’s response was to go on the front foot. In 2012, she publicly accused intelligence and security agencies of trying to kill her and in so doing turned the spotlight on them. If there was one thing that made her anxious, it was the safety of her three children, whom she eventually sent abroad. But for herself, there was no question of going anywhere. She stayed in Lahore right till the very end, fighting the good fight.