Montreal, 14 April 2015

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Spinning rhetoric and reality — India’s Prime Minister, Narendra Modi

India’s Prime Minster, Mr. Narendra Modi, begins a three-day official visit to Canada today. That the Canadian Government accords the visit great significance is indicated by the fact that Prime Minister Harper will participate in events in all three cities on Mr. Modi’s itinerary – Ottawa, Toronto and Vancouver. For most members of the Indian diaspora here in Canada, basking in the reflected glory of an India soon to outpace China in terms of economic growth, this is their moment in the sun as an assertive leader of an aspiring nation takes centre stage. He looks to the future and doesn’t look back and given his track record they feel the authoritative Mr. Modi means business. Indeed he has promised India ‘good governance’, the Gujarat model (the state he was Chief Minister of until he became Prime Minister of India) of rapid and sustained growth and has spoken up for the girl-child. And to businesses in Canada and the rest of a growth-starved developed west he has promised market opportunities in an India on the cusp of outpacing China and an authoritative leader who can deliver growth and governance.

But in looking ahead and turning a new page Mr. Modi and the BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party), the party he leads, want us to forget the past, a past that includes among other horrors the destruction of the historic Babri mosque in 1992, the re-writing of school texts to eulogize Hitler, and the Gujarat genocide of 2002 in which Muslim women in particular were brutally raped and killed while the government of Mr. Modi stood by instead of protecting them. Since the proverbial leopard does not change its spots, Mr. Modi’s Hindu nationalist roots, and his earlier record do not portend well, for the majority of Indians. Even as he ostensibly concentrates on authoritative governance and growth, the BJP and its sister organisations of the Sangh Parivar – an  ensemble of religious, social and political organisations tied together by the ideology of Hindu nationalism (Hindutva, making India a Hindu nation) — take forward their ideological agenda. Starting with ‘ghar vapasi’ (return to the fold) – a thinly-veiled religious reconversion programme to Hinduism directed to Christians and Muslims – which has been suspended but not discontinued, to the deification of Mahatma Gandhi’s assassin Nathuram Godse and the continuing vandalisation of churches, police custodial murders of Muslim youth, pulping of academic books that meet with the ire of Hindutva ideologues, all indications are that Mr. Modi and the Sangh Parivar are intent on imposing an exclusivist, narrow, intolerant Hindu identity on this plural nation. A plurality, tolerance and inclusiveness that was reflected in the visions of Mahatma Gandhi, Rabindranath Tagore, Khudiram Bose, Subhas Bose, B.R. Ambedkar, Jawaharlal Nehru, Bhagat Singh, Mridula Sarabhai, Chandrasekhar Azad,  and scores of others. And which for the most part has guided India’s post-colonial growth as a nation.

Neither is it clear that the much vaunted neo-liberal Gujarat model is one that the rest of India should follow. For example the Tamil Nadu model (a state in South India) of universal access, has delivered much better outcomes, compared with Gujarat, in terms of health, education, nutrition and gender-equity. Finally, to cater to the demands of big business and corporations, Mr. Modi’s attempts to repeal parts of the Land Act brought into law by the Indian Parliament in 2013 to increase compensation for land acquisition, paid to farmers as well as those who live off that land, suggests that he is willing to govern in the interests of the few rather than the many.

So as Canada and Canadians get ready to fete Mr. Modi and celebrate the many achievements of the world’s largest democracy it is worthwhile asking in which direction he and the Sangh Parivar intend to take India. A chauvinistic Hindu India with a neoliberal market economy is good neither for Indians nor the rest of the world.

CERAS, Montreal

(Centre sur l’asie du sud — forum for peace, secularism and democratic development in South Asia)

514-485-9192   cerasmontreal@gmail.com

SANSAD, Vancouver

(South Asian Network for Secularism and Democracy)

604-421-6752  sansad@sansad.org

SANSAD News-release, March 30, 2015

Deplore the Murder of Writers in  Bangladesh

South Asian Network for Secularism and Democracy (SANSAD) deeply mourns and deplores the killing of free-thinking blogger, Washiqur Rahman, who was hacked to death near his home in Dhaka, Bangladesh on Monday, March 30. This is latest in a series of murders of secularist writers in Bangladesh: Abhijit Roy, the US-bases engineer and outspoken atheist who founded the free-thinking blog, Mukto Mona was similarly murdered in Dhaka earlier this month. There have been three other such killings since 2004. Violence against writers have led the international media group, Reporters Without Borders to place Bangladesh 146th in a list of 180 countries in their ranking of press freedom in 2014.

Washiqur Rahman wrote a satirical blog under the pen-name of Kutshit Hasher Chhana (Ugly Duckling) championing secular values and condemning religious extremism and repression of ethnic minorities. Two of his killers who have been captured have been identified as belonging to religious schools, one near Chittagong and the other in Dhaka.

The death of Abhijit Roy provoked international outrage and brought out hundreds of writers and artists to the streets in Bangladesh to demand justice for the killing and adequate protection for secularist writers. There will no doubt be such protests and demands again for Washiqur Rahman, the  young man killed for upholding humanist values in a country that began with a secular constitution. We join our voice to the courageous activists, writers, and artists in Bangladesh who continue to uphold the values of secularism, democracy, and human rights, including the freedom of belief and expression. We affirm that these are the values that will bring to an end the dark days of political violence in Bangladesh. We stand in solidarity with secularists in Bangladesh in demanding justice for the dead and protection for those who write.

—Thirty—