Category Archives: Solidarity Links

Condemn the hanging of Yakub Memon

New Trade Union Initiative

B-137 Dayanand Colony, First Floor, Lajpatnagar Part IV, New Delhi 110024 Tel: 91-11-26214538 /26486931 Fax: 91-11- 26486931

E-Mail: secretariat@ntui.org.in

_____________________
Why we condemn the hanging of Yakub Memon: New Delhi, 30 July 2015:

A short while before 7 am this morning, the sole convict of the 1993 Mumbai blasts, Yakub Memon, was hanged until declared dead at the Nagpur Central Jail. Memon was charged under Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act (TADA) for his involvement in acts of terror, which allegedly included planning and financing it.

The hanging came at the end of 22 years since the incident in which Memon has already been incarcerated for 21 years. In the 20 hours preceding the hanging, efforts at the highest level of both the judiciary and the government worked to ensure it happened. Two pleas by Memon were rejected by the Supreme Court. A mercy petition was turned down by the country’s President late last night. The Supreme Court, in fact, for the first time ever in its history, ruled at 5 am this morning, but within less than 2 hours the government was ready to hang Memon. This undue haste was neither called for nor justified at the end of a case that has gone on for more than two decades.

Acts of terror by individuals, groups or the state is a threat to democracy and disrupts social life. Terror, directed at innocent people, targets communities and thereby undermines solidarity within the working class by widening divisions within society. While adequate punishment of the guilty is essential, as established by due process of law it is equally fundamental to protect the right of citizens to equality before law. It is not coincidental that the past-decade executions through the death penalty have been exclusively of muslims. It is also not coincidental that except for the left parties, no other political party has stood against capital punishment. It is also not coincidental that due process of law and laws of natural justice were not followed in these cases with the government playing a vengeful role to satisfy ‘collective conscience’. Equally, there is robust evidence now that 9 out of every 10 people who have been hanged in this country are either dalits or muslims.

In sharp contrast, those involved in innumerable instances of riots and pogroms by members of political parties and even legislators, including with the direct or indirect support of government, have in most cases not even been convicted. This inequality perpetuated through the criminal justice system and the judiciary not just amounts to inequality before law but also reflects the lack of autonomy of the judiciary from the executive. The fact that those on the death row have also failed to convince the president of the country to exercise the constitutionally provided power of pardon to protect the constitutionally provided right to life of every citizen also shows the inseparability of the presidential powers from that of the influence of the political class. The fact that 9 out of 10 persons handed out death penalty are muslims and dalits reinforces the inequality in and the deep prejudice of the legal system.

In the law on death penalty the Supreme Court has held, and reiterated, that if indeed there are ‘mitigating’ factors then a death penalty may be commuted. In Memon’s case the critical mitigating circumstance was that he cooperated with the investigative agencies and ensured that several of the accused surrendered. This too was over looked when in fact the power of the presidential pardon is to go into issues such as these that may go beyond the narrow confines of the rule book. If the presidential pardon is to merely mirror the views of the judiciary and the executive then there would have been no need for it. In this sense the President has, and now repeatedly, acted against the spirit of the constitution and democracy itself.

Anticipating protests, government, across the country and especially in Memon’s city, Mumbai, and in the national capital, has deployed its law and order machinery. In the last twenty-four hours demonstrators, against the death penalty have been detained and several hundred have been taken into preventive custody. Death penalty is today the ultimate instrument to terrorise a community, to crush dissent, and of course to isolate and demonise one community for party political ends and electoral gain.

We oppose the death penalty as it amounts to retribution which is both barbaric and the ultimate denial the right to life.

Gautam Mody

General Secretary

 

India’s shameful abstention at UNHRC vote

From kafila.org

Remember the Indian commitment to Palestine! Palestine Solidarity Committee in India

JULY 9, 2015

by Nivedita Menon

Personally, it’s reached a point where there isn’t one single thing done in the name of ‘India’ that doesn’t make me deeply ashamed…(NM)

Statement from Palestine Solidarity Committee in India

The Palestine Solidarity Committee, the All India Peace and Solidarity Organisation and Indian Campaign for the Cultural and Academic Boycott of Israel condemns the government of India’s abstention from a UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) vote for adoption of a UN Inquiry Commission report on Israel’s attack on Gaza, Palestine, last year. This is a blatant reversal of India’s longstanding policy of support to the Palestinians against Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. The vote in the 47-member Council was overwhelmingly against Israel; 41 countries vote in favor of the resolution, only one – the U.S. – voted against it; India was one of the 5 countries who abstained.

This is the first time India has abstained on such a resolution in the UNHRC. Even in July last year, New Delhi voted in favour of a UNHRC resolution criticizing Israel for the Gaza war.

In 2014, Israel attacked Gaza, “the killing of 1,462 Palestinian civilians, including 551 children and 299 women”. This attack on an already besieged population, caused large scale destruction; around 10,000 homes were destroyed and another 89,000 damaged and displaced as much as 30% of Gaza’s population. The world over, people condemned Israel’s brutality.

Israel has consistently tried to smear the UN Human Rights Council; it has been successful in securing a US boycott of the body through the years of the Bush administration. This is only one facet of Israel’s flaunting international law in its use of the occupied territories for settlements, and the grabbing of Palestinian land and other resources.

The present Indian government occasionally pays lip service to its “support” of Palestine. During the criminal assault on the population of Gaza, the BJP government grudgingly conceded a debate in parliament, specifically under a rule that disallowed voting.

Despite “clarifications” from the spokesman of the Ministry of External Affairs that this is not a reversal of India’s policy on Palestine, it is clear that India is changing its policy towards Israel and Palestine. Newspaper reports indicate that India’s vote is linked with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urging Modi not to support the resolution.

The following excerpted phrases from the UNHRC resolution indicate what the present Indian government refuses to support on the global stage:

“Emphasizing the importance of the safety and well-being of all civilians”

“reaffirming the obligation to ensure the protection of civilians in armed conflict”

“deploring the civilian deaths that resulted from the conflict in and around the Gaza Strip in July and August 2014, including the killing of 1,462 Palestinian civilians, including 551 children and 299 women”

“Gravely concerned by reports regarding serious human rights violations and grave breaches of international humanitarian law, including possible war crimes”

“Deploring the non-cooperation by Israel with the independent commission of inquiry on the 2014 Gaza conflict and the refusal to grant access to or to cooperate with international human rights bodies seeking to investigate alleged violations of international law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.”

“Alarmed that long-standing systemic impunity for international law violations has allowed for the recurrence of grave violations without consequence”

We can only read this rejection of such basic demands for justice as yet another strategy to strengthen ties with Israel, and prepare the ground for Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s plan to visit Israel sometime this year. Ties with Israel, especially military and security ties, are firmly in place. Modi’s visit to Israel will only cement this relationship, and implicate India in Israel’s war machine and apartheid policies.

On behalf of all Indians of conscience, we condemn the Indian government’s abstention from the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) vote for adoption of a UN Inquiry Commission report on Israel’s attack on Gaza in 2014. We demand that India not be party to whitewashing Israel’s flouting of international law and its occupation of Palestine. We also protest strongly against growing Indian ties with Israel, including military, security, trade, educational and cultural ties.

For The Palestine Solidarity Committee in India

(https://palsolcomindia.wordpress.com/)

Raja, Subhashini Ali, Saeed Mirza, Seema Mustafa, Prabir Purkayastha, S.P. Shukla, Achin Vanaik

For InCACBI (the Indian Campaigns for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel) (www.incacbi.in)

Sukumar Muralidharan, Githa Hariharan, Pushpamala N.

For AIPSO (All India People’s Solidarity Organization)

Niliotpal Basu, Pallab Sengupta

Black lives matter

Popular Resistance June 30th, 2015

Statement By Bree Newsome: “Now Is The TimeFor True Courage”*

RESIST! #BLACKLIVESMATTER, #FREEBREE, BLACK WOMYN, COURAGE, REVOLUTION

By Bree Newsome, www.bluenationreview.com

 

Now is the time for true courage

 

I realized that now is the time for true courage the morning after the

Charleston Massacre shook me to the core of my being. I couldn’t sleep. I

sat awake in the dead of night. All the ghosts of the past seemed to be

rising.

 

Not long ago, I had watched the beginning of Selma, the reenactment of the

16th Street Baptist Church bombing and had shuddered at the horrors of

history.

 

But this was neither a scene from a movie nor was it the past. A white man

had just entered a black church and massacred people as they prayed. He had

assassinated a civil rights leader. This was not a page in a textbook I was

reading nor an inscription on a monument I was visiting.

 

This was now.

 

This was real.

 

This was—this is—still happening.

 

I began my activism by participating in the Moral Monday movement, fighting

to restore voting rights in North Carolina after the Supreme Court struck

down key protections of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

 

I traveled down to Florida where the Dream Defenders were demanding justice

for Trayvon Martin, who reminded me of a modern-day Emmett Till.

 

I marched with the Ohio Students Association as they demanded justice for

victims of police brutality.

 

I watched in horror as black Americans were tear-gassed in their own

neighborhoods in Ferguson, MO. “Reminds me of the Klan,” my grandmother

said as we watched the news together. As a young black girl in South

Carolina, she had witnessed the Klan drag her neighbor from his house and

brutally beat him because he was a black physician who had treated a white

woman.

 

I visited with black residents of West Baltimore, MD who, under curfew, had

to present work papers to police to enter and exit their own neighborhood.

“These are my freedom papers to show the slave catchers,” my friend said

with a wry smile.

 

And now, in the past 6 days, I’ve seen arson attacks against 5 black

churches in the South, including in Charlotte, NC where I organize

alongside other community members striving to create greater

self-sufficiency and political empowerment in low-income neighborhoods.

 

For far too long, white supremacy has dominated the politics of America

resulting in the creation of racist laws and cultural practices designed to

subjugate non-whites. And the emblem of the confederacy, the stars and

bars, in all its manifestations, has long been the most recognizable banner

of this political ideology. It’s the banner of racial intimidation and fear

whose popularity experiences an uptick whenever black Americans appear to

be making gains economically and politically in this country.

 

It’s a reminder how, for centuries, the oppressive status quo has been

undergirded by white supremacist violence with the tacit approval of too

many political leaders.

 

The night of the Charleston Massacre, I had a crisis of faith. The people

who gathered for Bible study in Emmanuel AME Church that night—Cynthia

Marie Graham Hurd, Susie Jackson, Ethel Lee Lance, Depayne

Middleton-Doctor, Tywanza Sanders, Daniel Simmons, Sharonda

Coleman-Singleton, Myra Thompson and Rev. Clementa Pinckney (rest in

peace)—were only doing what Christians are called to do when anyone knocks

on the door of the church: invite them into fellowship and worship.

 

The day after the massacre I was asked what the next step was and I said I

didn’t know. We’ve been here before and here we are again: black people

slain simply for being black; an attack on the black church as a place of

spiritual refuge and community organization.

 

I refuse to be ruled by fear. How can America be free and be ruled by fear?

How can anyone be?

 

So, earlier this week I gathered with a small group of concerned citizens,

both black and white, who represented various walks of life, spiritual

beliefs, gender identities and sexual orientations. Like millions of others

in America and around the world, including South Carolina Governor Nikki

Haley and President Barack Obama, we felt (and still feel) that the

confederate battle flag in South Carolina, hung in 1962 at the height of

the Civil Rights Movement, must come down. (Of course, we are not the first

to demand the flag’s removal. Civil rights groups in South Carolina and

nationwide have been calling for the flag’s removal since the moment it was

raised, and I acknowledge their efforts in working to remove the flag over

the years via the legislative process.)

 

We discussed it and decided to remove the flag immediately, both as an act

of civil disobedience and as a demonstration of the power people have when

we work together. Achieving this would require many roles, including

someone who must volunteer to scale the pole and remove the flag. It was

decided that this role should go to a black woman and that a white man

should be the one to help her over the fence as a sign that our alliance

transcended both racial and gender divides. We made this decision because

for us, this is not simply about a flag, but rather it is about abolishing

the spirit of hatred and oppression in all its forms.

 

I removed the flag not only in defiance of those who enslaved my ancestors

in the southern United States, but also in defiance of the oppression that

continues against black people globally in 2015, including the ongoing

ethnic cleansing in the Dominican Republic. I did it in solidarity with the

South African students who toppled a statue of the white supremacist,

colonialist Cecil Rhodes. I did it for all the fierce black women on the

front lines of the movement and for all the little black girls who are

watching us. I did it because I am free.

 

To all those who might label me an “outside agitator,” I say to you that

humanitarianism has no borders. I am a global citizen. My prayers are with

the poor, the afflicted and the oppressed everywhere in the world, as

Christ instructs. If this act of disobedience can also serve as a symbol to

other peoples’ struggles against oppression or as a symbol of victory over

fear and hate, then I know all the more that I did the right thing.

 

Even if there were borders to my empathy, those borders would most

certainly extend into South Carolina. Several of my African ancestors

entered this continent through the slave market in Charleston. Their unpaid

toil brought wealth to America via Carolina plantations. I am descended

from those who survived racial oppression as they built this nation: My 4th

great grandfather, who stood on an auction block in South Carolina refusing

to be sold without his wife and newborn baby; that newborn baby, my 3rd

great grandmother, enslaved for 27 years on a plantation in Rembert, SC

where she prayed daily for her children to see freedom; her husband, my 3rd

great grandfather, an enslaved plowboy on the same plantation who founded a

church on the eve of the Civil War that stands to this day; their son, my

great-great grandfather, the one they called “Free Baby” because he was

their first child born free, all in South Carolina.

 

You see, I know my history and my heritage. The Confederacy is neither the

only legacy of the south nor an admirable one. The southern heritage I

embrace is the legacy of a people unbowed by racial oppression. It includes

towering figures of the Civil Rights Movement like Ida B. Wells, Martin

Luther King, Jr., Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, Medgar Evers and Ella

Baker. It includes the many people who rarely make the history books but

without whom there is no movement. It includes pillars of the community

like Rev. Clementa Pinckney and Emmanuel AME Church.

 

The history of the South is also in many ways complex and full of

inconvenient truths. But in order to move into the future we must reckon

with the past. That’s why I commend people like Sen. Paul Thurmond for

having the courage to speak truth in this moment.

 

Words cannot express how deeply touched I am to see how yesterday’s action

inspired so many. The artwork, poems, music and memes are simply beautiful!

I am also deeply grateful to those who have generously donated to the

defense fund established in my name and to those who have offered to cover

my legal expenses.

 

As you are admiring my courage in that moment, please remember that this is

not, never has been and never should be just about one woman. This action

required collective courage just as this movement requires collective

courage. Not everyone who participated in the strategizing for this

non-violent direct action volunteered to have their names in the news so I

will respect their privacy. Nonetheless, I’m honored to be counted among

the many freedom fighters, both living and dead.

 

I see no greater moral cause than liberation, equality and justice f­­or

all God’s people. What better reason to risk your own freedom than to fight

for the freedom of others? That’s the moral courage demonstrated yesterday

by James Ian Tyson who helped me across the fence and stood guard as I

climbed. History will rightly remember him alongside the many white allies

who, over the centuries, have risked their own safety in defense of black

life and in the name of racial equality.

 

While I remain highly critical of the nature of policing itself in the

United States, both the police and the jailhouse personnel I encountered on

Saturday were nothing short of professional in their interactions with me.

I know there was some concern from supporters on the outside that I might

be harmed while in police custody, but that was not the case.

 

It is important to remember that our struggle doesn’t end when the flag

comes down. The Confederacy is a southern thing, but white supremacy is

not. Our generation has taken up the banner to fight battles many thought

were won long ago. We must fight with all vigor now so that our

grandchildren aren’t still fighting these battles in another 50 years.

Black Lives Matter. This is non-negotiable.

 

I encourage everyone to understand the history, recognize the problems of

the present and take action to show the world that the status quo is not

acceptable. The last few days have confirmed to me that people understand

the importance of action and are ready to take such action. Whether the

topic is trending nationally or it’s an issue affecting our local

communities, those of us who are conscious must do what is right in this

moment. And we must do it without fear. New eras require new models of

leadership. This is a multi-leader movement. I believe that. I stand by

that. I am because we are. I am one of many.

 

This moment is a call to action for us all. All honor and praise to God.

 

#TakeItDown #BlackLivesMatter #FreeBree

.

Freedom of expression denied in educational institution

 

Press Release: Ambedkar-Periyar study circle IIT Madras

This is a press release from the Ambedkar-Periyar Study Circle – An initiative by IITM students.

PRESS RELEASE

Ambedkar – Periyar Study Circle was created as an independent student body on 14th April 2014, by a group of students from IITM to promote Ambedkar – Periyar thoughts and to initiate debates on socio-economic-political and cultural impacts which affects common mass within academic fraternity. The student of IITM has a dictum of using APSC as a platform for the above mentioned issues. As IITM has a long history of being a platform for right wing groups alone to propagate their own ideology and train young minds for their intellectual wings through Vivekananda Study Circle, RSS Shakha, Hare Rama Hare Krishna, Vande Matram, Dhurva etc… With this motto, in the past one year, we organized Hall meets, Movie Screening and pamphlet distribution among students and ignited debates on issues like: Agriculture under threat – Coal bed Methane project, GM Crops – Impact on Agriculture, Factory disputes Act 1947 (Amendment) and creating devastating effect on the labor conditions, Language Politics in India: past and present based on Sanskrit week celebrations, MHRD’s overt attempt to have separate vegetarian mess halls in IITs and IIMs and IITM administration’s move in replacing the name board of the faculties and laboratories with Sanskritized Hindi. We celebrated the birthdays of Bhagat Singh and Ambedkar and organized talks on ‘Understanding Bhagat Singh’ and Contemporary relevance of Dr. Ambedkar’. (For more information check our facebook page -Ambedkar periyar study circle IITmadras) Though the platform created a space for the students of IITM to discuss and debate on issues directly affecting the peasants, labours and the common mass, APSC continuously faced threats from rightwing groups inside IITM. Even the administration tried to curtail the activities of APSC, in June 2014, the DoS Dr.M.S.Sivakumar directed us to change name stating that the names ‘Ambedkar and Periyar’ are politically motivated and thus the study circle should be renamed with some apolitical titles without any personolity’s name.

APSC took stubborn decision to stick with the same title. We also indicated, the activities of right wing groups under the banner of Vivekananda Study Circle, but the Dean of Students said they have been using the name (Vivekananda) for many years and he denied to change the name of “Vivekananda study circle”. For a second time in September 2014, he sent a mail for the same reason, through MITR (the general counseling unit for students run by IITM admin) rather than from Dean’s office stating that the name is polarizing the students. We clearly explained the Dean, the motto of the study circle and relevance of Ambedkar and Periyar’s name. In this scenario, APSC celebrated Ambedkar’s birth anniversary and its first anniversary in April 2015 by organizing a talk on “contemporary relevance of Dr. Ambedkar”. Pamphlets were issued, on the basis of how communalism and corporatism are being the two sides of a single coin which is tossed by the present government against the common mass. The pamphlet contents were referred from leading magazines, newspapers and writings of Ambedkar (the copy of posters and pamphlets are attached) After this event, the above mentioned mail from Dean came on 22nd may 2015. (The copy of mail from dean is attached), it particularly states that “because of the misuse of the privileges” given to your study circle (Ambedkar-Periyar study circle) as an independent student body, your student body is de-recognized by the institute. However it does not contain any details regarding the privileges misused by the APSC. Based on the email, when we met Dean Students he gave a letter from MHRD with a subject matter “Distribution of controversial posters and pamphlets in the campus and creating hatred atmosphere among the students by one of the student group namely Ambedkar Periyar” and forwarded a copy of the complaint sent by the RSS students in IIT.

The anonymous complaint letter – as mentioned by the Under Secretary himself states that “APSC is trying to de-align the ST, SC students and trying to make them to protest against MHRD and Central government and trying to create hatred against honorable prime minister and Hindus”. Based on this complaint and MHRD letter, the Dean of students charge APSC that it misuses the privileges given by them and derecognize APSC. (For the reference the MHRD letter and complaint letter are attached.

The anonymous letter was sent on 29th April 2015, despite of its busy schedule? MHRD has taken this issue seriously and replied by 15th may 2015 itself. Previously IITM students have raised many important issues like Fee hike in IITs, Increase of fellowship to research scholars etc to MHRD. But it never responded to any of the above mentioned grievances. The fast track response to this particular issue shows its vested interest in protecting hindutva ideology and curbing democratic voices. We resent the fact that the Dean has de-recognized our study circle unilaterally without giving us a fair hearing and an opportunity to represent ourselves. In our face to face interaction with the Dean of Students, we have been told that our study circle engages in “controversial activities” and violated the code of conduct of independent student bodies. We are clear on the stand that we have not misuse any privileges given by the institute. So far our activities are engaged with the healthy discussion on socio-economic issues on scientific basis to promote the scientific temper among the student which is allowed by the Indian constitution. We have not been given a satisfactory definition of what entails “controversial”. Further, we were asked to give assurances that we shall desist from such activities in the future before the Dean (Students) can allow us to restart our activities. We have also been asked to route all our activities through the Dean’s office rather than the usual practice of routing all our discussions, plan of activities and pamphlets through our faculty adviser. This excessive scrutiny is unprecedented and does not apply to any other students’ organization. Vis-à-vis this move of DoS clearly shows, only opinions put forth by the right wing group will get the consent to see the light of the day, while the voices and opinion of the democratic students like us will be curtailed hereafter. Our discussions, meetings and pamphlets are meant to kick start a discussion within the campus among the academic fraternity. The issues that we discuss are very important and define the way we live our lives. IITM is a public funded higher education institute, whose vision and mission should abide for the upliftment of the common mass, who is the taxpayers. Rather, the move from DoS, IITM says there is no space for such opinions and discussions. We strongly believe that what we stated in our pamphlets and content of our discussion is correct as per the Constitution. Therefore, action against the Ambedkar-Periyar Study Circle by the DoS, IITM is undemocratic and unilateral against the interest of common mass for whom the Institute itself is indebted; hence we are not accepting this decision taken by the Institute.

G. Ramesh, The Co-coordinator Ambedkar Peryiar Study Circle, IIT Madras, Chennai – 600 036.

E Mail: apsc.iitm@gmail.com Mobile : +917299361319