Category Archives: Solidarity Links

Climate Refugees facing Crisis of Asylum

 From straight.com

Is Canada prepared for climate refugees?

by DANIEL TSEGHAY on DEC 23, 2013

Some estimates say the rising sea level will displace 30 to 50 million Bangladeshis by 2050.

THE WINDS, AT more than 150 kilometres per hour, flattened almost all the homes, leaving bodies washed as far as 90 kilometres from the coast. Rice fields were destroyed, thousands died, many more were displaced, and, ever since, the soil has been saturated with salt.

“The tsunami that devastated the region in 1988 was the trigger,’’ Donatien Garnier wrote in 2010’s Climate Refugees about the disaster that struck southwestern Bangladesh 25 years ago. “Salt contamination has been increasing since that time due to rising sea levels and reduced river flow during the dry season.…With saltwater penetrating further inland and deeper into the groundwater, global warming is gradually poisoning the population and destroying rice farming and jobs.’’

In Munshiganj, a 12-hour bus ride from the capital, Dhaka, people now take a boat across a river to drink uncontaminated water. Shrimp farms, employing few people, replace robust crops. People increasingly turn to fishing and hunting to survive, putting pressure on the stock of shrimp and fish hatchlings. This, in turn, drives others into the Sundarbans, a massive mangrove forest pressed against the Bay of Bengal and lying across both Bangladesh and India. The overexploitation of this UNESCO World Heritage Site is, consequently, having an impact on the biodiversity upon which thousands, directly or not, depend.

Among other drivers, the reality of a changing environment triggered by climate change is putting people in Bangladesh on the move. “In Bangladesh, the estimate is that 30 to 50 million people will be displaced by rising sea level by 2050,’’ Mohammad Zaman, the executive director of the Vancouver-based Society for Bangladesh Climate Justice (SBCJ), says in a phone interview with the Georgia Straight.

“The crisis has already started,’’ the social-sector specialist continues, pointing out that people are being displaced every day. On October 24, Zaman—who works as a consultant for the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank—and his organization held an event at the University of British Columbia’s Liu Institute for Global Issues to address the issue facing Bangladesh, situating it within the global phenomenon of climate migration.

Extreme weather events like Typhoon Haiyan, the global reduction of fish stocks and staples such as rice and wheat, rocketing food prices that trigger unrest and social instability, disputes over dwindling water reserves—all these developments are putting pressure on people to migrate.

“If you’re looking 50 years from now, that’s when the real impacts of sea-level rise start to manifest,’’ Robert McLeman, professor of geography at Wilfrid Laurier University, says during a phone interview with the Straight. “That’s when food supplies start to become under threat because of all these changes we’re making to climate systems.’’

McLeman is the author of the just-published Climate and Human Migration: Past Experiences, Future Challenges (Cambridge University Press). “We’ll get these large populations in places like Vietnam, coastal China, and Bangladesh, where you’d have tens of millions of people living within a few metres of sea level, and that’s where we’ll see very large-scale displacement.’’

People in Canada are also being displaced because of climate change. ‘‘In the North, we’ve seen erosion of coastal shorelines because of decreasing sea ice—which is a natural protector for shorelines against erosion by waves,’’ says Cheryl Schreader, a Capilano University geography professor, in a phone interview. “People in Tuktoyaktuk were talking about having to relocate part of their town because they’re located right on the coast. They were talking about having to move their spiritual sites and their graveyards because of these changes.’’

Exactly how many people will migrate globally is difficult to conclude in light of the many factors to consider. A 2009 report by the International Organization for Migration estimates that there will be between 200 million and 1 billion migrants due to climate change by 2050.

How such migrants will be received is even more difficult to conclude—but there are some telling signs.

“Bangladesh is bordered with Burma and India, and many displaced people have moved across these borders. In response, India has developed a long fence along Bangladesh to stop migrants,’’ the SBCJ’s Zaman says about the 2.5-metre-high structure—called the “wall of death’’ by locals—along the length of India’s 3,000-kilometre border with Bangladesh.

In 2011, the signatories to the UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees failed to tackle the reality of climate migration, and Canada neglected to sign up for the 2012 Nansen Initiative (launched by Norway and Switzerland), which is set to publish a report in 2015 providing recommendations on the issue.

“There are these countries in the West which aren’t really doing anything in terms of international agreements,’’ Cap U’s Schreader says. ‘‘I don’t see Canada playing a lead role in the status of climate migrants.’’

Stephanie Gatto is the lead author of a Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives report to be published early next year titled Starting the Conversation—Preparing B.C. for Climate Migration: An Uncertain Climate for Migration and Settlement. “With respect to climate migration, our current immigration and refugee policies and practices are not designed to accommodate the role of climate change and its impact on migration,’’ Gatto says.

“There are categories of refugees that are denied coverage for vision care, dental care, and prescription drugs,’’ Gatto notes. “Some of these people are fleeing exceptionally awful circumstances only to come to a country that won’t afford them coverage for the most basic needs. It’s a reflection of how our society’s prepared to treat the most vulnerable.’’

In 2010, the Canadian government passed the Preventing Human Smugglers From Abusing Canada’s Immigration System Act, dramatically changing our asylum system and establishing the practice of indefinite detentions of migrants. In the past year, almost 10,000 people have been put in administrative detention while the state considers their case. The average length of their stay is 25 days, but some are detained for years.

As of November 8 of this year, 585 people who had unsuccessfully applied for refugee status, or who did not have documentation, were being held in Canadian immigration cells. Sixty of them had been languishing for more than a year in a country that is one of the few western states to impose indefinite detentions on migrants.

In Maple Ridge, at the Fraser Regional Correctional Centre, asylum seekers are settled among criminals. They wear prison uniforms, and because guards in our province’s prisons don’t know the immigration status of detainees—and B.C. Corrections won’t differentiate between asylum seekers, other migrants, and various detainees—correctional authorities can’t say what proportion of inmates are seeking asylum.

In August 2010, when 492 Sri Lankan Tamil asylum seekers reached B.C.’s shores on the MV Sun Sea, a Thai cargo ship, they were, Gatto says, “generalized as potential terrorists’’ and queue jumpers.

Sara Kendall, a Vancouver community organizer involved with the Mining Justice Alliance, says the Tamils were treated accordingly. “All 492 of them were put in jail immediately, and they were fleeing one of the most violent situations on the planet,’’ Kendall tells the Straight by phone.

All 380 men—teenagers among them—were detained at the Fraser Regional Correctional Centre. The women without children were held at the Alouette Correctional Centre for Women; those with children ended up at the Burnaby Youth Custody Services Centre.

“In terms of seeing how it might get worse, I feel like it’s already bad enough,’’ Kendall says about the treatment of migrants in Canada. “Jailing refugees, criminalizing them, using [them for] our entertainment…on national television—it’s already at that place where we should really be ringing alarm bells.

“It is very conscious,’’ she says of the effort to depict migrants as taking advantage of Canada, which justifies their criminalization and plays a role in feeding them into the temporary-foreign-worker stream rather than the immigration process. “So what I’m seeing as a white Canadian,’’ Kendall says, “is that brown people from all over the world—or Eastern Europeans who are also racialized ‘others’—are unwelcome, with increasingly stricter policies to enforce it, except as cheap labour.’’

Exploring the reasons why some countries might be on this path, U.S. investigative journalist Christian Parenti’s 2011 book, Tropic of Chaos: Climate Change and the New Geography of Violence, makes the case that certain elements in society use the spectre of an influx of migrants to frighten the citizenry. (The Harper government, for instance, helped create, and then capitalized on, the anti-migrant sentiments swelling after the arrival of the Tamil asylum seekers in order to pass the “antismuggling’’ legislation being used to detain people today.)

“[T]he drift toward authoritarianism,’’ Parenti wrote, “has so far been driven less by genuine emergencies and more by the crass political theater of posturing candidates and elected officials.

“Immigrants are the canaries in the political coal mine, and immigration is the vehicle by which the logic of the ‘state of emergency’ is smuggled into everyday life, law, and politics.’’

Greek journalist and poet Constantine P. Cavafy’s 1904 poem “Waiting for the Barbarians’’ echoes this theme of powerful interests disingenuously constructing foreign threats for the purpose of social control and exploitation. The poem depicts a public square with an emperor anxiously awaiting the supposed arrival of barbarians near the main gate, the senators preparing to finally legislate, and consuls wearing “rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds’’.

Nearby, after the travellers fail to appear, one citizen recognizes the meaning of this spectacle.

“They were, those people,’’ the citizen says of the barbarians, “a kind of solution.’’

 

US Scholars Support Boycott of Israel

 

Published on Monday, December 16, 2013 by Common Dreams

‘Historic’: US Scholars Stand with Palestinians in Boycott of Israel

‘This stance in solidarity with Palestinian freedom is historic and signals a new era of engagement with colonized populations’

– Sarah Lazare, staff writer

An association of 5,000 academics on Monday became the largest U.S. scholarly organization ever to join the boycott of Israeli academic institutions.

The American Studies Association, which calls itself “the nation’s oldest and largest association devoted to the interdisciplinary study of American culture and history,” announced Monday that its membership passed a resolution stipulating the organization “endorses and will honor the call of Palestinian civil society for a boycott of Israeli academic institutions.”

The resolution, which was introduced last year and unanimously endorsed by the ASA’s national council on November 4th, attracted an unprecedented number of voters, with 66.05% endorsing the resolution, 30.5% against, and 3.43% abstaining, according to the ASA statement.

“The overwhelming majority that voted in favor of the resolution illustrate that we refuse to lend complicity to Israel’s aggression,” Steven Salaita, associate professor of English at Virginia Tech and a member of the ASA Activism Caucus, told Common Dreams. “This stance in solidarity with Palestinian freedom is historic and signals a new era of engagement with colonized populations.”

The resolution passed with an outpouring of support from ASA members, including renowned activist, author, and scholar Angela Davis. “The similarities between historical Jim Crow practices and contemporary regimes of segregation in Occupied Palestine make this resolution an ethical imperative for the ASA,” she wrote. “If we have learned the most important lesson promulgated by Dr. Martin Luther King—that justice is always indivisible—it should be clear that a mass movement in solidarity with Palestinian freedom is long overdue.”

The ASA has faced an onslaught of criticisms and attacks from pro-Israel forces, including calls from former Harvard president and Obama administration official Larry Summers for a boycott of the ASA on grounds that the resolution violates academic freedom and perpetuates anti-Semitism.

Yet Alex Lubin, Director of the Center for American Studies and Research at the American University of Beirut, slammed such accusations writing last month in The Nation,

Academic freedom means very little when it takes place in a context of segregation and apartheid. Change came to the Jim Crow South not through academic dialogue, but through protest and, in some cases, through boycotts of the institutions that fostered segregation. Change came to South Africa’s apartheid system not through academic dialogue, but through protest, resistance, and an international boycott. Those of us who value academic freedom must always struggle to ensure that the world surrounding academia provides the basic human rights that enable academic life.

“The boycott resolution is intended to address a profound case of discrimination against Palestinians and is consistent with the ASA’s previous endorsement of anti-racist positions in other areas,” Lubin stated upon endorsing the resolution. “The resolution does not target Israelis, Jews, or any individuals; indeed, the ASA’s support for the boycott affirms its opposition to all forms of racial discrimination, including, but not limited to, anti-Semitism and Islamophobia.”

The call for boycott, divestment, and sanctions against Israel emerged from Palestinian civil socieity organizations in 2005 in a bid to win human rights, self-determination, and freedom from occupation for Palestinians, using tactics similar to those levied to transform apartheid South Africa.

Palestinian activist Omar Barghouti writes in The Nation that 2013 has seen great strides in the academic wing of this BDS movement:

Days ago, in a letter of support to the ASA, the University of Hawaii Ethnic Studies department became the first academic department in the west to support the academic boycott of Israel. In April, the Association for Asian-American Studies endorsed the academic boycott—the first professional academic association in the United States to do so. Around the same time, the Teachers’ Union of Ireland unanimously called on its members to “cease all cultural and academic collaboration” with the “apartheid state of Israel,” and the Federation of French-Speaking Belgian Students (FEF), representing 100,000 members, adopted “a freeze of all academic partnerships with Israeli academic institutions.” Also this year, student councils at several North American universities, including at the University of California Berkeley, called for divestment from companies profiting from Israel’s occupation.

The full text of the ASA’s resolution follows:

Whereas the American Studies Association is committed to the pursuit of social justice, to the struggle against all forms of racism, including anti-semitism, discrimination, and xenophobia, and to solidarity with aggrieved peoples in the United States and in the world;

Whereas the United States plays a significant role in enabling the Israeli occupation of Palestine and the expansion of illegal settlements and the Wall in violation of international law, as well as in supporting the systematic discrimination against Palestinians, which has had documented devastating impact on the overall well-being, the exercise of political and human rights, the freedom of movement, and the educational opportunities of Palestinians;

Whereas there is no effective or substantive academic freedom for Palestinian students and scholars under conditions of Israeli occupation, and Israeli institutions of higher learning are a party to Israeli state policies that violate human rights and negatively impact the working conditions of Palestinian scholars and students;

Whereas the American Studies Association is cognizant of Israeli scholars and students who are critical of Israeli state policies and who support the international boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement under conditions of isolation and threat of sanction;

Whereas the American Studies Association is dedicated to the right of students and scholars to pursue education and research without undue state interference, repression, and military violence, and in keeping with the spirit of its previous statements supports the right of students and scholars to intellectual freedom and to political dissent as citizens and scholars;

It is resolved that the American Studies Association (ASA) endorses and will honor the call of Palestinian civil society for a boycott of Israeli academic institutions. It is also resolved that the ASA supports the protected rights of students and scholars everywhere to engage in research and public speaking about Israel-Palestine and in support of the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement.

_____________________

 

 

 

On the SC judgement on Section 377: Statement from TISS teachers

From posting on Kafila.org/2013/12/13

By Nivedita Menon

DECEMBER 13, 2013

It is with deep shock and disappointment that we received the regressive judgment of the Supreme Court dated 11-12-13, on the reading down of Section 377 of the IPC related to the rights of queer (lesbian bisexual gay and transgender…) people in this country, which reverted the decriminalisation of non-normative sexualities following the Delhi High Court judgement in 2009.

The Delhi High Court had based its expansive judgement on the eloquent discussion of constitutional morality by the framers of our Constitution, especially Dr. Ambedkar. Constitutional morality, they argued is the basis for equality of citizens since public morality which is largely the morality of the dominant forces in society can never guarantee democracy, and perhaps even more importantly equality and dignity to its citizens, especially its most marginal citizens. Additionally, The Delhi High Court judgement evoked the spirit of dignity, inclusiveness and non-discrimination, thereby emphasizing equality of all citizens that Nehru spoke of during the Constituent Assembly debates, so necessary for the deeply hierarchical social fabric that our country represents.

We, the undersigned teachers at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences express solidarity with the struggle for the recognition of the basic human and democratic rights of LGBT citizens and for our right to self-determination in keeping with the foundational principles of the Indian Constitution.

In solidarity,

1)    Meena Gopal, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

2)    Wandana Sonalkar, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

3)    Asha Achutan, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

4)    Bindhulakshmi, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

5)    Sangita Tosar, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

6)    K.C. Bindu, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

7)    Ilina Sen, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

8)    Nishi Mitra, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

9)    Zeba Imam, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

10)Sujata Chavan, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, School of Development Studies.

11)Anjali Monteiro, Centre for the Study of Contemporary Culture, School of Media and Cultural Studies.

12)K.P. Jayasankar, Centre for Critical Media Praxis, School of Media and Cultural Studies.

13)Shilpa Phadke, Centre for the Study of Contemporary Culture, School of Media and Cultural Studies.

14)Faiz Ullah, Centre for the Study of Contemporary Culture, School of Media and Cultural Studies.

15)Nikhil Titus, Centre for Critical Media Praxis, School of Media and Cultural Studies.

16)Ketaki Ranade, Centre for Health and Mental Health

17)Roopa Madhav, School of Habitat Studies

 

18)Trupti Jhaveri Panchal, Centre for Equity for Women, Children & Families, and Special Cell for Women & Children Maharashtra & Resource Centre for Interventions on Violence Against Women (RCI-VAW)

 

19)Taranga Sriraman, Vinita Ajgaonkar, Yashoda Pradhan, Manisha Kande (Resource Centre for Interventions on Violence Against Women)

20)Sivakami Muthusamy, Centre for Health and Social Sciences, School of Health Systems Studies.

21)Nilesh Gawde, School of Health System Studies

22)Vijayakumar, Centre for Social and Organisational Leadership

23)Lata Narayan, Centre for Lifelong Learning.

24)Tejaswini Niranjana, Centre for Indian Languages in Higher Education.

25)Monica Sakhrani, Centre for Social Justice and Governance

26)Bal Rakshase, Centre for Health Policy Planning and Management, School of Health Systems Studies.

27)Shalini Bharat, Centre for Health and Social Sciences, School of Health Systems Studies.

28)Sanjay (Xonzoi) Barbora, TISS, Guwahati

29)R. Ramakumar, School of Development Studies

30)Manish Jha, Centre for Community Organisation and Development Practice, School of Social Work

31)Mahuya Bandyopadhyay, School of Development Studies

32)Anjali Dave, Centre for Equity for Women Children and Families, School of Social Work.

33)Sabiha Vasi, Centre for Lifelong Learning.

34)Rekha Pappu, TISS Hyderabad

35)Padma Velaskar, Centre for Studies in Sociology of Education

36)A. Ramaiah, Centre for Study of Social Exclusion and Inclusive Policies.

37)Neela Dabir, Deputy Director, Admn

38)Shubhada Maitra, Centre for Health and Mental Health, School of Social Work.

39)Geeta Sethi, LSE-TISS Chair Professor, School of Health Systems Studies.

40)Vijayaraghavan, Centre for Criminology and Justice

41)Swati Banerjee, Centre for Livelihoods and Social Innovation, School of Social Work.

42)Anil S Sutar, Centre for Research Methodology.

43)Tanveer Hasan, Centre for Indian Languages in Higher Education.

44)Shalini Sharma, TISS Guwahati.

45)Sandhya Limaye, Centre for Disability Studies and Action, School of Social Work.

46)Subharati Ghosh, Center for Health and Mental Health

47)Asha Banu, Centre for Health and Mental Health, School of Social Work.

48)Katy Gandevia, School of Social Work

49)Anil Kumar, Centre for Health and Social Sciences, School of Health Systems Studies.

50)Suryakant Waghmore, Centre for Environment Equity and Justice

51)Leena Abraham, Centre for Studies in Sociology of Education

52)Shivani Chauhan Barooah, Labour Studies and Social Security, TISS Guwahati.

53)Sohini Banerjee, TISS Guwahati

54)Rekha Mammen, Centre for Community Organisation and Development Practice

55)U.Vindhya, TISS Hyderabad

56)Padmini Swaminathan, TISS Hyderabad

57)Priyanka Jawale, School of Law, Rights & Constitutional Governance

58)Surinder Jaswal, School of Social Work & Doctoral Students Office

59)Samhita Barooah, TISS Guwahati

60)Janki Andharia, Jamshedji Tata Centre for Disaster Management

61)Bela Bhatia, TISS

62)Hemal Shroff, School of Health System Studies

63)Nandini Manjrekar, School of Education

64)Sohini Sengupta, TISS

65)Mahima Nayar, Centre for Disability Studies and Action

66)Mouleshri Vyas, Centre for Community Organisation and Development Practice, School of Social Work

67)A. Rambabu, Centre for Studies in Social Exclusion and Inclusive Policies

68)Shankar Das, Centre for Health Policy Planning

69)Jyothi Krishnan, TISS

70)Shahaji Chavan, TISS

71)G G Wankhede, School of Education

72)P.K. Shajahan, School of Social Work

73)Lakshmi Lingam, Deputy Director, Hyderabad

74)T. Jayaraman, School of Habitat Studies

75)S. Parasuraman, Director, TISS

and many other TISS faculty.

 

International Human Rights Day 2013

 

A UFCW Canada Human Rights Department Release

December 10, 2013 – International Human Rights Day is commemorated annually on December 10th. Sixty-five years ago, on this date, the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights (UNDHR) was born, as a mechanism to promote human rights for all people.

These rights are universal, indivisible, interdependent and inter-related. The interrelation and interdependency between human rights and the rights of working people and families – to earn a decent wage, to be able to provide for their children, to have protective shelter, and to thrive – is an often overlooked facet of human rights. These labour rights have allowed Canada to prosper for over a century. The immense contribution and struggles of aboriginal workers, immigrants, women, men, disabled workers and the LGBT community, has meant that some of us have been able to celebrate, provide, and share, while others continue to face ongoing struggles for basic necessities in society.

International Human Rights Day marks a time for reflection as the New Year approaches and 2013 falls to the history books. Unfortunately, 2013 marks a pivotal year of mean-hearted attacks on the human rights and labour rights of individuals and families in Canada. Horrendous Harper Tory legislation has created immense challenges for seasonal workers who migrate to work in Canada as a way to improve the lives of family members in the global South. The impact of these spirited attacks can be seen close to home where many families must deal with the prospects of lost wages now and in the year to come, such as those who work for the Heinz Plant in Leamington, Ontario, set to close in 2014. An attack on working families IS an attack on human rights.

Corporate world greed resulting in the 2008 meltdown unfortunately seems to be the ongoing pattern for 2014. Mr. Harper and the Tory caucus will attempt to ram through two pieces of legislation that attack working families and Canadian values: Bills C-525 and C-377. Both bills have a central goal – to undermine the ability of working people to come together in their workplaces. Bill C-377 attempts to tie up unions with red tape and bureaucracy a mile high so that they are too busy to do their first job: to represent and protect working people and families. Bill C-525 makes it exceptionally more difficult for working people to join trade unions, as is their right under Section 23 of the UNDHR.

Indeed, less money in the pockets of those who most need it, working families, is to be the result of these atrocious and unnecessary changes brought on by these bills.

International human rights day marks exactly two weeks prior to Christmas Eve. With the impending holiday season, let us all be thankful for the contribution of all workers towards laws that protect working people and families, and let us vigorously commit to ensuring that these human rights won’t be so easily trampled on in 2014.

 

In solidarity,

Paul Meinema

National President

 

UFCW Canada is Canada’s largest private sector union with more than 250,000 members across the country working in almost every sector of the food industry from field to table. UFCW Canada in association with the Agriculture Workers Alliance (AWA) (www.awa-ata.ca) also operates ten agriculture workers support and advocacy centres across Canada, which have provided assistance to thousands of workers since the first centre opened its doors in 2002.